Betterfolio
Betterfolio team
Skills dossiers from BoondManager: producing the client dossier without retyping
The Boond record already holds the profile, the skills and the assignments. The client dossier is built from that record, with no retyping in Word and no copy from LinkedIn.
In short
The client dossier is built from the Boond record, then filed back into it. Retyping the same data in Word pulls the dossier away from the record, takes time, and sends a text nobody has reread.
- Three copy-paste sources keep coming back: an outdated Word CV, LinkedIn, and the last dossier you sent and then duplicated. None of them is maintained the way the Boond record is.
- Six steps are enough: an up-to-date record, the opportunity, a dossier base, adaptation, the consultant's review, and a return to Boond.
- Time is saved on the record. A dossier generated from a thin record stays a thin dossier.
- The salesperson keeps three decisions: which assignments to show, how to word the scope, and the consultant's review.
- Boond stays the source. The dossier is a view of that record, for one need and one date.
Why retyping sets in
Nobody chooses to retype. The client dossier format is not the record format, and the client wants the PDF the same day. Word gets opened.
Three copy-paste sources
- The consultant's Word CV. It is often several months old, it misses the latest assignments, and it is longer than the client will read.
- LinkedIn. People open it because the page looks more recent. They copy a job title, reword it, and nobody checks that it matches what Boond shows.
- The last dossier sent. It gets duplicated, the name is swapped, two assignments change. The previous dossier's mistakes leave with the new one.
What retyping costs
The lost time is visible. The other costs show up when the client compares two documents.
| Cost | What happens | Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Time | Manual copy of data already entered | Slower reply to the request |
| Gap | The dossier and the Boond record do not say the same thing | Two documents sent to the same client contradict each other |
| Record not updated | The fix is made in Word, not in Boond | The next dossier starts from a wrong fact |
| Review | Nobody knows which version is the right one | A dossier goes out without the consultant's sign-off |
A salesperson who prepares 6 dossiers a week and spends 45 minutes on each one retyping data already in Boond spends 4 hours 30 minutes a week on it. Over 46 weeks, that is about 200 hours a year, five full-time weeks for a single role. The figure comes from those assumptions, not from a market average.
What Boond already holds
An up-to-date resource record holds most of what a dossier needs. The exact fields depend on your instance. The use of them does not.
| Data in Boond | Use in the client dossier | Watch-out |
|---|---|---|
| Resource title and profile | Header, job title | Adapt it to the need, do not paste it unchanged |
| Skills and levels | Skills block | Rank by relevance, 6 to 8 lines at most |
| Experience and references | Detailed assignments | Often too short: context, scope and result are missing |
| Training, certifications, languages | Rare signals | Move them up if the need requires them |
| Availability | Availability banner | Check it on the day you send |
| Attached CV | Starting point when the record is thin | Enrich it once, then stop reopening it |
| Opportunity | Frame of the dossier: which need, which client | It decides what you put first |
The dossier does not create new data. It selects, orders and rewords what is already on the record.
From the Boond record to the client dossier
Step 1. Clean the source record, once
This is where the time is saved. An up-to-date record turns the next dossier into an adaptation. A thin record turns it into a rewrite.
Start with the profiles you propose most often, and with those who will be available in the next two months. There is no point cleaning the whole database at once.
Step 2. Start from the opportunity
Open the Boond opportunity before you touch the dossier. Three questions are enough: who the client is, which skills are actually required, and what made the last profile fail on this kind of assignment.
Those three answers decide the order of the assignments. A dossier that starts from the consultant lists everything they can do. The client is looking for an answer to their need.
Step 3. Generate the dossier base from the record
The base takes the CV and the data already in Boond: profile, skills, experience, certifications, languages. No intermediate export, no Word file to reopen.
At this point the dossier is complete and still generic. It goes out after the adaptation, not before.
Step 4. Adapt it to the need
This part stays manual. It comes down to four moves:
- Put first the assignment closest to the client's need
- Reorder skills to match the request, keeping 6 to 8 lines
- Reword the scope of two or three key assignments
- Move the rare item (certification, clearance, language) to the top of the page
The same consultant, at two levels of detail:
On the Boond record: "Java developer, bank, 2021 to 2023. Java, Spring Boot, Kafka."
In the client dossier: "Rebuild of a bank's settlement engine. Led the Kafka migration with no service interruption, and settled the architecture with the compliance team. Stack: Java 17, Spring Boot 3, Kafka, PostgreSQL."
The record is one line of technologies. The dossier adds the scope and the result. That rewording is done once, then it stays on the record for the next sends.
Step 5. Have the consultant review it
The consultant rereads their own presentation before it goes out: assignments, figures, availability. It takes five minutes and avoids the mistake that costs an interview. If they complete their own record, you also get what only they know.
Step 6. Export, send, file back into Boond
The dossier goes to the client as a PDF, then comes back into Boond, attached to the record, with its version number. The next person who opens the record sees what was sent, to whom, and when.
Without that return, the dossier stays a file in a mailbox. On the next request, someone retypes.
What stays with the salesperson
The record can supply the list of assignments and skills. It does not choose what answers the need.
| Step | What can come from Boond | What the salesperson keeps |
|---|---|---|
| Selection | The list of assignments and skills | The choice of what answers the need |
| Wording | Titles and dates | The scope of responsibility and the result |
| Positioning | Availability, level | The decision to show a rate or not |
| Review | Nothing | The consultant's agreement on the final text |
A dossier generated with no review carries the same risk as one retyped in a hurry. The review takes five minutes. Retyping takes forty-five.
Traps, from Boond to the dossier
Fixing the dossier and not the record
You spot a mistake, you fix it in the dossier, you send. The Boond record keeps the mistake. The next dossier picks it up. Every fix is made on the record.
Filling gaps from LinkedIn on every dossier
LinkedIn can fill a hole, once. If you go back on every send, the record was not enriched. Complete the record, then start from Boond for that consultant.
Forgetting anonymisation
A client dossier may have to hide end-client names or contact details. The rule is set once. You check that it applies before export.
Overwriting data you already cleaned
When two systems exchange data, one can overwrite the other. Decide in advance which data (skills, technical data) stays as it is in Boond.
Internal objections
"Our Boond records are too thin"
The problem sits upstream of the dossier, and it is fixed once. Take the ten profiles you propose most often, enrich their records, then measure the time of the next dossier. The rest of the database can wait.
"Every client wants their own format"
The format changes from one client to the next. The consultant's data stays the same. One template per client and one record per consultant removes the retyping.
"Consultants never update their CV"
They do when the update has a visible effect. When the consultant rereads their dossier before it goes out, they correct it at the moment the document leaves for the client.
"We have always done it in Word"
Time three dossiers, from the first click to send. In most teams, layout takes longer than choosing the content.
Checklist before sending a dossier that came from Boond
On the source record
- Experience states the context, the scope and the result, not only the stack
- Skills are up to date and limited to the most relevant ones
- Certifications and languages are filled in
- Availability is checked on the day you send
On the dossier
- The dossier starts from the opportunity, not from a duplicated previous dossier
- The assignment closest to the need comes first
- The consultant has reread the final text
- The PDF you sent is attached to the Boond record, with its version number
Frequently asked questions
Can you create a skills dossier from BoondManager without retyping?
Yes, if the resource record is filled in. The dossier reuses the profile, skills, experience, certifications and languages already in Boond. You still adapt the content to the client's need, have the consultant reread it, and file the result back into Boond.
Do you still need LinkedIn or the Word CV?
Only to fill a gap, once. If you go back on every dossier, the Boond record is not rich enough. Enrich it, then start from Boond for that consultant.
What do you do when the Boond record is incomplete?
Start from the attached CV to complete experience and skills, then have the consultant confirm the additions. Handle first the profiles you propose most often. Cleaning the whole database at once costs time for a small gain.
Where do you keep the final dossier?
In Boond, attached to the resource record, with a version number. The team sees what was sent, to which client, and on which date. The file does not live only in a mailbox.
How do you keep the dossier and the record from diverging?
Every fix is made on the Boond record, then the dossier is regenerated or adapted. A fix made only in the PDF comes back on the next dossier.
Where Boond stops and the dossier tool starts
BoondManager holds candidates, resources and opportunities. The client document, laid out and adapted to one request, is produced in a dossier tool connected to it.
| Step | What the tool speeds up | What the salesperson keeps |
|---|---|---|
| Creation | Dossier created from a CV already in Boond | The choice of which profile to propose |
| Layout | Brand, template, PDF export | The order of the information |
| Adaptation | Reordering of skills | The wording of the scope |
| Return | Finished dossier filed back into Boond, with its version number | The decision to send |
Betterfolio is an official BoondManager partner. It creates the dossier from Boond data, then files the finished dossier back on the record, without going through Word. If BoondManager is down for maintenance, Betterfolio says so and lets you keep working.
Guarani describes the time saved between HR and sales. Clevermind describes adoption by the sales team, with the dossier staying in Boond. For the next step, how a shortlist is built is in Shortlist of 3 ESN profiles.
What to keep
The dossier sent to the client reuses the Boond record, adapted to one need. Retyping that record in Word creates a gap between the two documents.
Three habits:
- Enrich the record once, starting with the profiles you propose most often.
- Start from the opportunity, not from an old duplicated dossier.
- Fix the record, and attach every sent dossier back to Boond.
The time you save goes into choosing which assignments to put first.
If you already work in BoondManager, you can see how Betterfolio connects to it.
Read next
A shortlist of 3 profiles at an ESN: structure, order and what the buyer reads in 30 seconds
A strong consultant can lose because the shortlist is poorly put together. How to choose, order and present 2 to 3 competency dossiers so they hold up to a reading of a few dozen seconds.
GEO and AEO for IT services firms: appearing in ChatGPT, Perplexity and Copilot answers
Definitions, AI crawlers, page and competency dossier structure, a 30-day measurement plan. What an IT services firm can control, and what no provider can promise.
Betterfolio vs Showcase (DoYouBuzz) vs Middleman: which tool for your IT services firm in 2026?
A comparison of the three French competency portfolio tools. BoondManager integration, real day-to-day adoption by managers, candidate qualification and pricing models: what actually matters when you choose.
